Weeping Yurei

Looks like it will become "Bugging Yurei" in the future. Its unique mechanism that attacks investigator during chaos token revealing can cause plenty of issues.

Let me first: what if someone plays Hypnotic Gaze to cancel its attack during a skill test? Let's say the investigator is testing (3) and reveals a , then they plays Hypnotic Gaze to cancel that attack and then to reveal a chaos token following Hypnotic Gaze's ability. Before this revealing, should they put the token drawn before back to the chaos bag first? Though the rule specified that skill tests cannot be embedded, this chaos token revealing is actually not a skill test.

RyanMuQ · 1280
The curse token is still outside of the bag when you play Hypnotic Gaze in response to Yurei's attack. After you resolve Hypnotic Gaze's event, put that token back in, then continue with the skill test (with the curse token still outside). I don't believe this scenario is ambiguous. — toastsushi · 74
I meant this is an example of scenario that I need to think more to figure out what will happen. So every Kōhaku player needs to spend much more time on deck building and explaining rules during game play, which is painful for me since I cannot focus on the role-playing. For example, you have to explain why they must do their fighting skill test on [Counterpunch](card/60112) AFTER the current skill test due to the no-embedding-skill-test rule, or you have to double check if your [Spectral Razor](card/06201) can defeat this enemy if you revealed a curse token. Though you will finally get the answer (sometimes not), it is painful. — RyanMuQ · 1280
limit once per test, reveal bless or curse token during test. Hypnotic gaze is not a skill test; even if it were not specific to skill tests, limit once per test takes care of it. You'd need to nest skill tests, which is not impossible but is also not trivial. — Lailah · 1
Long Shot

Vicious Blow is probably the most used card in this game, tied with Deduction, and their omnipresence in deckbuilding hasn't decreased since the core game came out.

Long Shot arrives much later in the game and looks very similar, with just a few exceptions:

  • Cons:
    • No icons
  • Pros:
    • Can be committed to evasion tests
    • Can be committed to a test at a connecting location
    • No icon means it can be committed to non- attacks like Mystic Spells, or Rogue Tricks. (Thanks @dscarpac for pointing it out in the comment)
  • Other:

At this state of the game, anyone using a full collection should not experience difficulties passing tests anymore in Easy/Standard or even Hard mode if they optimise their decks slightly, so the downside of the missing icon seems less important than the flexibility offered by Long Shot.

So, will it be a new staple for any fighty ? Let's find out when users start publishing decks!

Valentin1331 · 78937
The lack of an icon might be a Pro, since It also can be committed to Shriveling or Backstab, which might be great for team play (Carson?). — dscarpac · 1217
A con you overlooked is that the artwork absolutely stinks. — Blitheharrow · 51
Art is subjective. I think the artwork is one of the best things about it. — BubbaAristotle · 1
Another pro - it is a separate instance of damage so it can help against those 1 damage at a time enemies. — Markthr · 1
Help pls :) How does "commit Long Shot to a fight test against an enemy at a connecting location" work? If I have Ice Pick, can I do a fight test against an enemy at a connecting location when I commit Long Shot? — walla · 1315
If one of your other players fights or evades an enemy at a connecting location. — LazilyExtroverted · 7
Thanks LazilyExtroverted, I play true solo, I guess I can't fight an event at a connecting location with my Ice pick. I was hoping to be able to throw that brick from the card. — walla · 1315
Correction: I guess I can't fight an enemy at a connecting location with my Ice pick. — walla · 1315
Hoods

I think the reviews on this page are outdated after multiple expansions have added to the cardpool and I wanted to point out that I think this weakness is now pretty reasonable to deal with, and statistically, is probably just going to cost you 1 damage and 1 horror. It could do more if you fail tests, but Rita now has a few ways of dealing with this.

The primary way now that is unmentioned is with Sweeping Kick from Edge of the Earth. If you hold one of these in hand (assuming you draw it before Hoods) this is a 3 damage attack with rita baseline 8 to 3. Even the -5 in Forgotten Age poses no threat here. The hoods attacks you for 1 damage and 1 horror, and of course, taking the horror isn't good, but hopefully you have Rita's Boyfriend out by now. Taking this option from scenario 1 requires In The Thick of It, and Rita has the health pool to willingly take the 2 physical Trauma.

A more expensive way of removing them from the deck if you intend to cycle, is Fend Off 3. You once again take the 1 damage and 1 horror, but then you never worry about this aloof enemy ever again. Someone else has already mentioned the overcommitting needed on something like Brute Force, but it isn't out of the question to have Overpower or a Gravediggers Shovel handy, which puts you at 8 to 3, needing to oversucceed by 2 which is statistically most of the bag most of the time.

At the time of writing this review just before the release of Hemlock Vale, we have had spoiled a symbol-less Survivor version of Vicious Blow, called Long Shot which can add the needed +1 damage to a Derringer or Baseball Bat attack. This method if you're going the combat stat could result in a single fight action, basically completely neutering Hoods as a weakness.

As of now, I think the cardpool is just getting more flexible, and as it does, the Hoods becomes a weaker and less threatening weakness. As you get some XP into your deck, it becomes yet easier. I think as of now, Hoods is a below average weakness with multiple ways of dealing with it, and statistically the worst outcome seems to be 2 actions and 1 point of damage and horror, which is pretty manageable. Barring autofails, this weakness can be a single action to deal with in a variety of ways. Timing of course can change things, and enemy weaknesses should never be underestimated for showing up at the worst possible time, but I think at this point, no matter how Rita chooses to fight them off, they just aren't much of a threat, because they are just yet another enemy, and Rita is done runnin'.

Bewitching means that you can start with Sweeping Kick set aside, ready to tackle the Hoods whenever they show up. — vercingix · 217
Sparrow Mask

I don't think it can be overstated how powerful this card will be for either both front options for Agnes (with regular back). She will be able to test most of her Willpower tests at an effective base of 7.

Regular Agnes: If you can take horror regularly enough (Ward of Protection, Forbidden Knowledge etc), she can get multiple uses a turn.

Parallel Agnes: Due to being able to choose when to deal damage to herself, I think Parallel Agnes is even stronger. Assuming she has the soak available (which she should, it's an Agnes deck), she should be able to improve every test she has to make.

Another combo I thought of that Benwobbles didn't also mention, you can also use Smoking Pipe/Painkillers as batteries for this.

TrisJ1 · 8
Using this now with Parallel Agnes on a run through the Innsmouth Conspiracy and this card seems like it was made for our favorite waitress. My initial design was for only 5 skill cards and it has really worked out well. A super combo with Drain Essence and Bandages. Depending on the spell mix this mask can easily be triggered for every test you need to take in a turn. — Staticalchemist · 1
What's up with the border, the golden border, on this cards commit Agility icon? Is it just me or does this card have a unique golden border for some unexplained is reason? — Quantallar · 8
"Hit me!"

In Night of the Zealot, Midnight Masks, playing standard difficulty.

Imagine you are testing 3 vs 3. For instance, Wendy or Skids has 3 and wants to investigate a shroud 3 location. You draw a -1 and you would fail. There are 15 remaining tokens in the bag. Playing Hit me would draw the next probabilities.

-2/15 -> you fail.

-2/15 drawing the 0 -> you fail

-1/15 drawing the

-1/15 drawing the , maybe you succeed (depends on the effect)

-9/15 remaining tokens. Prob success= 60%.

In Dunwich, playing Ashcan Pete in Standard difficulty. Imagine you investigate with Duke 4 v 4. You draw a -1. Hit me! There are 14 remaining tokens. Only the zeros, the skulls and the autofail make you fail. That is 65% probs of success.

This card can make you pass a -1 fail. I guess this card gets better if:

1-your elder sign is powerful and cause you to pass (Skids, Ashcan Pete, Will Yorick, ...)

2-If you play expert there are less zeros

3-You want to succeed by something and there are a lot of negatives in the bag. Maybe you draw the -4 and activate some succeed by 3 effect.

I can't see many scenarios where this is better than Lucky. Ok, Lucky is fantastic. But this card is not reliable, nor unplayable. I think you might play it if you like gambling.

MarcMF2 · 8