4 XP is just a lot to spend on a hand tool that only gets one clue per action. Making tests easy is nice, non-investigate clue sources are nice, clue-from-connecting location is a good perk, and sometimes you care about parley. But currently outside of Alessandra Zorzi I don't see a home for this as a staple, more a tech card for campaigns that frequently punish investigate actions. Maybe in a single cluever deck that runs this with lockpick and thieves kit to find one ASAP.
Soutien. Main
Objet. Illicite.
Coût: 2. XP: 4.
Truand
Choisissez un ennemi dans votre lieu : Discussion. Effectuez un test de (0). Ce test gagne +1 à sa difficulté pour chaque soupçon sur les Faux papiers. En cas de réussite, découvrez 1 indice dans votre lieu ou dans un lieu connexe. En cas de réussite avec un écart de 1 ou plus, placez 1 ressource sur les Faux papiers, en tant que soupçon. En cas d'échec, renvoyer les Faux papiers dans votre main.
Lin Hsiang
The Feast of Hemlock Vale Investigator Expansion #82.
No image
Cartes en relation
- Fake Credentials (The Feast of Hemlock Vale Investigator Expansion #66)
FAQs
No faqs yet for this card.
Reviews
Trish might also be a good candidate to investigate and finding a clue without an AoO.
—
Tharzax
· 1
I think this needs to be played in a Parley deck. This is a synergy card for Parley enablers and payoffs. Otherwise there are certainly better cards for fewer XP. It can also serve as a tech card. Imagine this card for instance a scenario with high shroud locations with a big enemy about. I can think of a couple of campaign finales where this is the case. I would list some of these if I was able to spoiler tag this text. If you go into one of these campaign finales and have 4 XP left, you might consider this as an upgrade for your Rogue.
—
PowLee
· 20
The art is a clue. This is a 2 clue per test for Trish
—
BubbaAristotle
· 1