Acte. Stage 2

Mythe
Indices: –
Avec la formule entre les mains, vous avez finalement un moyen de détruire les créatures qui ravagent Dunwich... mais seulement si vous survivez assez longtemps pour l'utiliser.

Objectif – Vous devez vaincre autant d'ennemis Rejeton de Yog-Sothoth que possible. S'il n'y a aucun exemplaire du Rejeton de Yog-Sothoth en jeu ou mis de côté, avancez.

Adam Lane
Aux Frontières du Visible #241. Aux Frontières du Visible #6.

La Lignée est Éteinte - Back

Acte
Alors que vous terminez l'incantation, l'immonde créature pousse un hurlement rauque et inhumain. Elle gronde et grogne mais les sons qu'elle émet ne ressemblent à aucune langue connue. Tout en hurlant, la créature se recroqueville sur elle-même et disparaît sans avertissement. Tout ce qui subsiste est un ignoble relent et une marque répugnante qui imprègne la végétation à l'endroit où se trouvait la bête.

(→ C2)

Ils Doivent Être Détruits !
Ils Doivent Être Détruits !

FAQs

No faqs yet for this card.

Reviews

"If there are no copies in play or set aside, advance."

This wording confuses me, it feels like if they wanted this act to advance when all broods everywhere are dead, they would have stated this as "no copies in play AND set aside". Therefore, if there is a single brood in play and you defeat it before any other spawns (even if there are still broods in set aside zone), you get to advance the act.

But this doesn't feel intended to me. Waiting for broods to spawn doesn't feel correct either.

What's the correct rule here? English is not my main language so I could be interpreting this wrong. Using or/and in a sentence like this would mean different things in my language, but it could be a simple grammatical rule in English? (using or instead of and in a negative structure maybe?)

Aesyn · 552
or maybe using "nor" instead of "or" would be better? I think the correct answer — Aesyn · 552
I think the correct answer is that you need no copies in play nor set aside, since there are some setups you already start with no copies in set aside. — Aesyn · 552
Waiting for broods to spawn is the right thing to do here. Sometimes, particularly in solo, this might result in one brood never spawning (because you need to draw a certain treachery for that). In that case, it is better to resign. Note, that you can advance, if all copies had been spawned, but some forgot about their victory points due to "Mind Wipe" and went to the encounter discard pile instead of the victory pile. — Susumu · 366
Checked again, there is actually no difference between advancing the final Agenda and resigning in this scenario. However, if there had been 2 or less sacrifices, you will need to draw "The Creatures' Tracks" once to spawn all of the set aside broods. — Susumu · 366
You do not advance until all the broods are defeated. You spawn or set aside a combination of broods, and there are mechanisms that spawn them into play from the set aside area. You keep playing until you resign or until you spawn and defeat all of them. — StyxTBeuford · 12985
The “or” here is therefore intentional. “And” would imply you advance when either area is empty. — StyxTBeuford · 12985
If the intention is that you need the play area AND the set aside to not have any copies of that enemy, then this is awfully written. OR means one thing or the other, so if either is true, you'd advance, ruled as written. This is another example of rules being mathematically wrong — laiozatt · 1